Home
Telecom
Telecom News
Delhi High Court Refrains From Interfering With TRAI's Penalty Recommendation

Delhi High Court Refrains From Interfering With TRAI's Penalty Recommendation

By Press Trust of India | Updated: 23 December 2016 13:25 IST

Highlights

TRAI suggested Rs. 1,050 crores penalty on Vodafone
Court cannot interfere in communications between government departments
TRAI contended that it was not required to give a hearing

The Delhi High Court today refrained from directing the Centre or any other authority not to act upon TRAI's recommendation to impose Rs. 1,050 crores penalty on Vodafone for not providing interconnectivity to Reliance Jio as no one except the regulator was a party in the case.

Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, however, on Vodafone's plea, made the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) of the Ministry of Communication a party in the case and directed it and TRAI to file a reply to the telecom major's plea challenging the recommendation.

"How can I stop anyone else or the Union government from acting on the recommendation when they are not before this court? I will make the government a party and will issue notice to it. Its presence is necessary," the judge said and listed the matter for hearing on January 3 next year.

The order came after Vodafone, represented by senior advocate Rajiv Nayar, claimed that Reliance Jio (RJio) has gone to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) with the recommendation made by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and sought that the other authorities be restrained from acting upon the regulator's suggestion.

During the hearing, the court said it was of the prima facie view that TRAI seems to be only a recommendatory body or a wing of the government from which the government takes advice and thus, under their internal mechanism they may follow a procedure as per law or as they deem fit.

It also said that in communications between two departments of the government, the court cannot interfere.

TRAI, represented by senior advocate Meet Malhotra and advocate Kirtiman Singh, on the other hand, contended that it was not required to give a hearing to Vodafone before it gave its recommendation and admitted that no such hearing was given to the telecom major.

Malhotra also told the court that when Vodafone and other private telecom companies had first entered the Indian market, the state telecom companies, MTNL and BSNL, "had also adopted similar tactics" of not providing interconnections and then also TRAI had taken similar steps.

(Also see: Airtel Says Has Provided 7,000 More Points of Interconnect to Jio)

TRAI also said that apart from its recommendation, it had also given a direction to all service providers to comply with the licence conditions and this has not been challenged.

TRAI has recommended imposition of a fine of Rs. 50 crores for each of the 21 circles of Vodafone, except in Jammu and Kashmir, coming to a total of Rs. 1,050 crore.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.