EU Commission Clarifies Revamped Copyright Rules Amid Criticism

A key provision, Article 17, would force YouTube, Instagram, other sharing platforms to install filters to prevent uploading of copyrighted materials.

EU Commission Clarifies Revamped Copyright Rules Amid Criticism

The platforms can be sued for making copyright-infringing content available to the public

Highlights
  • Critics say filters are costly and could lead to erroneous blocking
  • EU countries have until June 7 to transpose directive into national law
  • Article 17 should not apply to caricature, parody, criticism, review

The European Commission on Friday sought to clarify the scope and liability of revised copyright rules adopted last year in an effort to defuse criticism from France, Poland, EU broadcasters, and Internet activists.

The revamped copyright directive, the first overhaul in two decades, aimed to provide fair compensation for the bloc's $1 trillion (roughly Rs. 73,00,090 crores) creative industry and its 11.7 million employees.

It triggered a fierce lobbying battle, pitting artists and news publishers against tech companies, Internet activists and consumer groups, with France also joining the fray while Poland took its grievance to a court.

A key provision, Article 17, backed by the creative industry, would force Google-owned YouTube, Facebook's Instagram, and other sharing platforms to install filters to prevent users from uploading copyrighted materials.

The platforms can be sued for making copyright-infringing content available to the public, even where it has been uploaded by their users. Critics however say filters are costly and could lead to erroneous blocking.

EU countries have until June 7 to transpose the directive into national law.

The Commission in its policy paper published on Friday said Article 17 would only apply to online service providers and online audio and video streaming service providers which make money from copyrighted work uploaded to their platforms by their users.

Not-for-profit online encyclopaedias and educational bodies, open source software platforms, and online marketplaces would be exempt from the rule.

Companies may escape liability if they can show that they have made their best efforts to obtain authorisation for copyrighted works on their platforms and acted speedily to remove content when notified.

To mollify Internet activists, the Commission said Article 17 should not apply to caricature, parody, criticism, review, and quotation.

It said automated blocking of content should only be limited to manifestly infringing uploads and that EU countries should provide a complaint and redress mechanism to service providers so that their users can use it in the event of disputes.

© Thomson Reuters 2021


It's an all television spectacular this week on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast, as we discuss 8K, screen sizes, QLED and mini-LED panels — and offer some buying advice. Orbital is available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.
Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on Twitter, Facebook, and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Further reading: EU, European Commission
FBI Says It Is Investigating About 100 Types of Ransomware, Many Trace Back to Actors in Russia: Report

Related Stories

Share on Facebook Tweet Snapchat Share Reddit Comment
 
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2021. All rights reserved.
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com