3D-Printed Head Unlocks Top Android Phones, iPhone X ‘Impossible’ to Beat: Report

Share on Facebook Tweet Share Reddit Comment
3D-Printed Head Unlocks Top Android Phones, iPhone X ‘Impossible’ to Beat: Report

Apple iPhone X was the only smartphone that survived the test

Highlights

  • Forbes tested facial recognition on top Android phones and iPhone X
  • All Android phones' facial unlocking could be spoofed
  • Only the iPhone X remained 'impossible' to beat

Most modern smartphones now ship with facial unlocking features these days. The promise of a quicker way to unlock your smartphone by just looking at it seems quite interesting. It offers an alternative to the good old trustworthy passcode, but is it really secure? No doubt this has been a major topic of debate ever since facial recognition technology started appearing on smartphones. A Forbes reporter decided to test it out with a 3D-printed model of his own head. What happened next may (or may not) surprise you.

Thomas Brewster, a reporter at Forbes, managed to get a 3D-printed model of his head at Backface in Birmingham, UK for around GBP 300 (roughly Rs. 21,100). The 3D model is created after capturing detailed photographs via 50 different cameras and editing the images. The result is a life-size 3D model that resembles an actual person and in this case the reporter himself.

The test was conducted on five different smartphones - iPhone X, LG G7 ThinQ, Samsung Galaxy S9, Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and OnePlus 6. After setting up the facial unlocking feature using his real face, Brewster was able to unlock all the four Android smartphones using the 3D printed model of his own head. He admits all the Android phones were unlocked with 'differing degrees of ease'.

But he couldn't unlock the iPhone X. He claims the iPhone X was impossible to beat with the 3D-printed model. At the launch of the iPhone X, Apple had claimed that it worked with Hollywood studios to test out its Face ID technology with 3D printed facial masks and other objects to see if it can be spoofed. But back in 2017, security researchers in 2017 had claimed to have found a way to bypass Apple's Face ID technology using an affordable face mask.

Even though the Android devices failed badly, Brewster says most manufacturers were found to be serving notices during facial unlock activation that the feature isn't completely secure, and is more of a convenience. Some Android manufacturers also advise customers to keep a passcode on as a secondary method of unlocking their phone, adding to the security.

However, the Forbes test also found no such warning on the OnePlus 6. The publication also claims it was the 'least secure' of all the devices they tested.

Even as mobile phone companies look towards making lives easier for their customers, at the end of the day it is up to the users themselves on what they pick. If you want to keep your phone secure, the passcode is still a great way to go about it. A combination of a fingerprint reader and a passcode work well as well. As for facial unlock, it's still more of a convenience for most mobile phone users rather than a 100 percent secure solution.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on Twitter, Facebook, and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Stunning design and display
  • Great cameras
  • Wireless charging
  • Assured, timely software updates
  • Bad
  • Costs a small fortune
  • First party apps not great in India
  • Fast charger not bundled
Display5.80-inch
Processor2.39GHz hexa-core
Front Camera7-megapixel
Resolution1125x2436 pixels
RAM3GB
OSiOS 11
Storage64GB
Rear Camera12-megapixel + 12-megapixel
Battery Capacity2716mAh
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Excellent build quality and compact design
  • Stereo speakers
  • Good battery life
  • Snappy all-round performance
  • Very good rear camera
  • Vivid HDR display
  • Bad
  • Intelligent Scan feels clunky
  • Attracts fingerprints easily
Display5.80-inch
Processorocta-core
Front Camera8-megapixel
Resolution1440x2960 pixels
RAM4GB
OSAndroid 8.0
Storage64GB
Rear Camera12-megapixel
Battery Capacity3000mAh
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Excellent buildquality, design and display
  • Useful stylus
  • Very good cameras
  • Speedy performance
  • Bad
  • Slightly heavy
  • Battery life could be better
Display6.30-inch
Processorocta-core
Front Camera8-megapixel
Resolution1440x2960 pixels
RAM6GB
OSAndroid 7.1.1
Storage64GB
Rear Camera12-megapixel + 12-megapixel
Battery Capacity3300mAh
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Looks great
  • Excellent performance
  • Useful software customisations
  • Bad
  • Average camera quality
  • No wireless charging or weatherproofing
Display6.28-inch
Processor2.8GHz octa-core
Front Camera16-megapixel
Resolution1080x2280 pixels
RAM8GB
OSAndroid 8.1 Oreo
Storage128GB
Rear Camera16-megapixel + 20-megapixel
Battery Capacity3300mAh
Harpreet Singh Harpreet is the community manager at Gadgets 360. He loves all things tech, and can be found hunting for good deals when he’s not shopping online. More
Japanese Electronics Firms Look to Re-Engineer Their Design Mojo
iPhone XR's Weak Demand Sees Q1 2019 Shipment Estimates Slashed: Ming-Chi Kuo
 
 

Advertisement

 

Advertisement