Samsung Galaxy M32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro comparison

Show Only Differences Highlight Differences	Samsung Galaxy M32 5G	Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro
key specs
Display	6.50-inch	6.00-inch
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 720	Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Front Camera	13-megapixel	8-megapixel
Rear Camera	48-megapixel + 8-megapixel + 2-megapixel + 2-megapixel	16-megapixel
RAM	6GB, 8GB	4GB
Storage	128GB	32GB
Battery Capacity	5000mAh	5000mAh
OS	Android 11	Android 6.0
Resolution	720x1600 pixels	1080x1920 pixels
general
Brand	Samsung	Samsung
Model	Galaxy M32 5G	Galaxy A9 Pro
Release date	August 25, 2021	-
Launched in India	Yes	-
Form factor	Touchscreen	Touchscreen
Battery capacity (mAh)	5000	5000
Fast charging	Proprietary	-
Colours	Slate Black, Sky Blue	Pink, Gold, White
Dimensions (mm)	-	161.70 x 80.90 x 7.90
Weight (g)	-	210.00
Removable battery	-	No
display
Screen size (inches)	6.50	6.00
Touchscreen	Yes	Yes
Resolution	720x1600 pixels	1080x1920 pixels
hardware
Processor	octa-core	1.8GHz octa-core
Processor make	MediaTek Dimensity 720	Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
RAM	6GB, 8GB	4GB
Internal storage	128GB	32GB
Expandable storage	Yes	Yes
Expandable storage type	microSD	microSD
Expandable storage up to (GB)	1000	256
camera
Rear camera	48-megapixel + 8-megapixel + 2-megapixel + 2-megapixel	16-megapixel
No. of Rear Cameras	4	-
Rear autofocus	Yes	-
Rear flash	Yes	LED
Front camera	13-megapixel	8-megapixel
No. of Front Cameras	1	-
Pop-Up Camera	No	-
software
Operating system	Android 11	Android 6.0
Skin	One UI 3.1	-
connectivity
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
USB Type-C	Yes	-
NFC	-	Yes
Infrared	-	No
USB OTG	-	Yes
Headphones	-	3.5mm
FM	-	Yes
Number of SIMs	-	2
Wi-Fi Direct	-	No
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)	-	No
sensors
Fingerprint sensor	Yes	-
Proximity sensor	Yes	Yes
Accelerometer	Yes	Yes
Ambient light sensor	Yes	Yes
Compass/ Magnetometer	-	Yes
Gyroscope	-	Yes
Barometer	-	No
Temperature sensor	-	No
sim 1
SIM Type	-	Regular
GSM/CDMA	-	GSM
3G	-	Yes
4G/ LTE	-	Yes
sim 2
SIM Type	-	Regular
GSM/CDMA	-	GSM
3G	-	Yes
4G/ LTE	-	Yes

Related Comparisons

Popular Mobile Brands