• Home
  • Apps
  • Apps News
  • Apple’s Request to Delay App Store Changes in Fortnite Epic Case Denied by US Judge

Apple’s Request to Delay App Store Changes in Fortnite-Epic Case Denied by US Judge

Epic went to trial earlier this year over Apple's practice of forcing developers to use its in-app payment system.

Apple’s Request to Delay App Store Changes in Fortnite-Epic Case Denied by US Judge

Apple believes no additional business changes should be required to take effect

Highlights
  • Apple immediately said it would appeal the denial
  • Apple's own in-app payment methods would still be more convenient
  • Apple has appealed the judge's ruling, asking her to pause her orders

A US judge on Tuesday denied Apple's efforts to pause orders handed down after an antitrust case brought by Fortnite creator Epic Games.

The iPhone maker immediately said it would appeal the denial, aiming to stave off potentially significant changes to its lucrative App Store before a December 9 deadline to implement the court's orders.

Epic went to trial earlier this year over Apple's practice of forcing developers to use its in-app payment system and to pay commissions to the iPhone maker. In September, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a ruling that was mostly favorable to Apple.

But she expressed concern that Apple was keeping consumers in the dark about alternative payment methods and ordered Apple to lift its ban on in-app links, buttons and messages to users about other ways to pay.

Apple has appealed the judge's ruling, asking her to pause her orders while the appeals process plays out, which could take several years.

In a sharp rebuke to the iPhone maker, Gonzalez Rogers said that Apple's prohibitions on telling consumers about other payment methods showed "incipient antitrust conduct including supercompetitive commission rates resulting in extraordinarily high operating margins" for its App Store.

She wrote that Apple's own in-app payment methods would still be more convenient than third-party methods and that many consumers might still choose to use it.

"The fact remains: it should be their choice," Gonzalez Rogers wrote. "Consumer information, transparency, and consumer choice is in the interest of the public."

Apple said it will appeal Gonzalez Rogers' denial to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which could grant Apple a temporary stay before the December 9 deadline.

"Apple believes no additional business changes should be required to take effect until all appeals in this case are resolved. We intend to ask the Ninth Circuit for a stay based on these circumstances," Apple said in a statement.

© Thomson Reuters 2021


What's most interesting about Apple's new MacBook Pros, M1 Pro and M1 Max silicon, AirPods (3rd Generation), and Apple Music Voice plan? We discuss this on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.
Comments

Catch the latest from the Consumer Electronics Show on Gadgets 360, at our CES 2022 hub.

Further reading: Apple, Epic Games, Fortnite, App Store
NASA Postpones Astronaut Moon Landing to 2025 at Earliest, Missing Deadline by a Year
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE With Exynos 2100 SoC Spotted on Geekbench

Related Stories

Share on Facebook Tweet Snapchat Share Reddit Comment
 
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2022. All rights reserved.
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com