Micromax A110 Superfone Canvas 2 review

 

micromax-a110-story-635.jpg

With big screen phones, popularly known as phablets, gaining prominence, and the increasing demand for budget alternatives, Micromax decided to upgrade its Canvas line-up, within two months of launching its first 5-inch phone, the A100. The successor to the A100, the A110 or Canvas 2 features a Dual Core processor, an IPS panel, and an upgraded 8-megapixel camera. Here's our review of the device.

Hardware
The front of the phone looks strikingly similar to the Samsung Galaxy S III and the Note II, except for the absence of a physical home button. The chrome speaker grill, front camera and sensors are positioned similar to that of the Note 2. There are markings for three capacitive touch buttons below the display. There's no Micromax branding on the front of the phone. There's a chrome trim around the phone that was a little too shiny for our liking. On the right side, there's a big power key, while the volume rocker sits on the left hand side. Both these keys also sport a chrome finish, but kind of lack refinement, in our opinion. The Micro-USB port and the 3.5mm audio ports sit on the top of the phone. The back cover is made of plastic and has a matte finish. The material used feels durable, and offers a good grip. The camera lens, however, protrudes out towards the top, and feels awkward. There's a dual LED flash besides the camera. The back also sports Micromax branding and a speaker.

In terms of hardware, the device is powered by a 1GHz dual-core processor with 512MB RAM, and has 4GB internal storage expandable up to 32GB with microSD card.

micromax-a110-camera-635.jpg

The Micromax A110 is a dual-SIM smartphone and supports GSM SIM card in both the slots. The SIM Card slots and a slot for the micro SD card hide behind the back cover just above the battery slot. Unfortunately, the SIM cards and the Micro SD cards are not hot-swappable and you'll have to take the battery out if you want to replace either of them.

Display
The Micromax A110 comes with a 5-inch 262k colour capacitive touch screen with an IPS panel sporting a resolution of 480x854 pixels. We found the screen resolution to be pretty low for a device of this size, and the graphics and text appeared to be less sharp. The viewing angles looked good, and the under-sun visibility on the phone was decent, though we found the screen to be highly reflective.

Camera
The 8-megapixel autofocus shooter takes decent images in daylight, although we feel that colour reproduction could have been better. Also, we observed that pictures taken in low-light conditions and indoors (without the use of the LED flash) were a bit grainy. The dual-led flash fulfills its intended purpose. The quality of videos captured through the back camera was average. Overall, we feel that the phone's good for casual photography.

camera-shot-635.jpg

A daylight shot taken with the Micromax A110 Canvas 2

There is also a 0.3-megapixel front camera, which takes average pictures, and can be used for video conferencing. We wish the phone had a dedicated camera button to help click a quick picture.

Software/ Interface
The Micromax Canvas 2 runs Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich). Micromax has skinned some elements of the user interface, such as the app icons and the notification tray. The notification tray includes toggles for settings such as Wi-Fi, Brightness, Rotation, Bluetooth, GPS, Data and profiles (for alerts and other notifications). Similar to other ICS devices, there are five customisable home screens that can be filled with app shortcuts and widgets.

Screenshot-169x300.png

Micromax has also included some of its own apps including its own apps and content store, M! Store, and services store, M! Zone, in addition to its messaging app, HookUp, and friends locator app, M! Buddy and a few games (Fruit Devil, Cricket Fever). The handset also offers FM Radio.

The handset sports three capacitive buttons - a Menu key, Home button and a Back key. Long pressing the Home key opens the app-switcher for switching between open/previously accessed apps. To be honest, we find the menu button redundant. Perhaps, Micromax could allow users to use the menu button exclusively as the app-switcher, on the lines of newer HTC phones.Also, the phone could do with stock icons, and we're not sure why Micromax decided to skin them. We also noticed that Micromax's app store was offering apps such as Viber and Nimbuzz, which are otherwise free, as paid apps.We checked with Micromax and they informed that their app store offers ad-free versions of the apps.

During our use of the phone we noticed some minor lag, especially while playing games, but other than that, we'd rate our overall experience as above average. We expected a bit more from a phone that runs on a dual-core processor. We're not sure if the phone would get updated to Jelly Bean, which offers a smoother user experience compared to ICS.

Performance/ Battery Life
The phone is powered by a 1GHz dual-core processor that is a MediaTek chip, and has 512MB of RAM on board. We did not encounter any crashes while working on the phone and multitasking was comfortable. We did notice some lag while navigating through the menu, and while playing some games. We were not able to play 1020p HD video clips, and 720p clips also stuttered. The phone also doesn't support .avi videos natively, but that can be easily fixed by downloading third-party video players.

The phone comes with the native Android browser and renders all webpages well. The phone doesn't come with Adobe Flash. The speaker on the phone delivers good quality sound but volume levels are low. Also, since the speaker is located at the back, the volume levels further decrease when the phone lies on its back. The phone surprisingly doesn't include an ambient light-sensor, so there's no setting for automatic brightness, and the user would need to manually set brightness levels for the screen.

Call quality was good. The phone is a dual-SIM GSM phone with support for one active and the other in active-standby mode.

The Micromax Canvas 2 comes with a 2000mAh battery and we were satisfied with the backup that it offered. We were able to get around 7 hours of video playback, even with the display on full brightness levels. With intermediate usage during the day, including playing games, a few calls, and e-mail and Twitter notifications turned on, we were able to get about one-and-a-half days of backup. The phone would easily give 7-9 hours of usage on a single charge.

Verdict
The Micromax A110- Canvas 2 is a decent upgrade to the A100. A 5-inch screen phone at a price point of Rs 9,990 is indeed a value for money proposition. We wish Micromax could have offered a better screen, and shipped this phone with Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. Micromax has already announced the successor to the Canvas 2, the A116 or Canvas HD, which is expected to be available in February. The Canvas HD features a Quad-core processor (again a MediaTek chip), a 5-inch 720p display and Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. It's expected to be priced below Rs. 15,000. So if you can spend a little more, we'd recommend waiting for the Canvas HD. There's also the Karbonn S1 Titanium, which also has a quad-core processor, and sports a 4.5-inch qHD (960x540) multi-touch capacitive touch display and runs Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. The phone's been priced at Rs 10,990 and pre-bookings have already started. But we'd wait until we've had a chance to run that unit through our tests before recommending.


Micromax A110 Superfone Canvas 2: First look

  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery life
  • Camera
  • Value for money
  • Good
  • Big display
  • Decent Hardware
  • Good battery backup
  • Bad
  • Poor screen resolution
  • Slight lag
  • No ambient lighting sensor

Display

5.00-inch

Processor

1GHz

Front Camera

0.3-megapixel

Resolution

480x854 pixels

RAM

512MB

OS

Android 4.0

Storage

4GB

Rear Camera

8-megapixel

Battery capacity

2000mAh

For the latest technology news and reviews, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and get the NDTV Gadgets app for Android or iOS.

Tags: Android, Android 4.0, Android mobiles, Ice Cream Sandwich, Micromax, Micromax A110, Micromax A110 price, Micromax A110 price in India, Micromax A110 review, Micromax smartphones, smartphones

 


Comments

More From NDTV »

More From Web »

 

Mobiles »

Lara Iris Pro 20 review: Low price and high aspirations

In the not so distant past, recommending a smartphone under 15 thousand rupees would generally bring up the name of a nondescript local brand. These brands understood the pulse of the average Indian smartphone buyer and the only OEM that managed to stay relevant in this scheme of things, albeit with highly underpowered devices, was Samsung. Then, recently, a storm hit the market. Motorola introduced the Moto G in the Indian market. The modus operandi: Aggressive pricing, tying up with the most popular e-commerce platform and doling out freebies to early buyers. The result: 16GB edition of the phone was sold out within hours. No. We aren't reviewing the Moto G. In fact, we are going to review the Lava Iris Pro 20 - a phone that was launched soon after the Moto G without much fanfare and is priced tantalisingly close to the quad-core beast by Motorola. In addition, the elder sibling Lava Iris Pro 30 costs just a couple of thousands more. With lofty ambitions, the Lava Iris Pro 20 truly faces the daunting task of proving its mettle. Look and feel We have to hand it to Lava for creating the perfect iPhone clone, at least when one looks at it head on. If the iPhone had a bigger screen it could look something like this. Both, the Lava Iris Pro 20 and Iris Pro 30 look like a mashup between the iPhone 4s and the 5s. Please understand that this is a compliment. We will go as far as to say that it looks better than the Moto G. The Lava Iris Pro 20 is sleek at 7.7mm and weighs just 112g. The phone feels great in the hand and works absolutely fine for single-handed usage. We've always believed that 4.7-inches is the right size for a smartphone. Unfortunately, OEMs and buyers seem to think otherwise. The only downside of the otherwise good design is the rather tacky metal chrome trim running around the edges. The left edge is completely bare and the right edge houses the physical buttons for the power and volume adjustment functions. The bottom has the Micro-USB port for data transfer/charging the device and the microphone, and the top has the lone 3.5mm jack. The distinctively plastic back is blue in colour and has a rather neat Iris Pro 20 logo bang in the center. The back also houses the 8-megapixel camera and the dual flash. Prying open the cover reveals a non-removable 2000mAh battery, and the slots for the two SIM cards and Micro-SD card, which we have to add is extremely flimsy and should be handled with care. For navigation, Lava has decided to slap the Iris Pro 20 with a capacitive touchscreen buttons which lie below the display. The discreet lights only glow when users hit that designated region. We think it is rather understated and classy. Above the display is front-facing VGA camera, earpiece and the ambient light sensors. Features and Specifications This is where Lava cuts corners. The Iris Pro 20 features a quad-core processor but not from a reputed chipset maker. More importantly, in a day and age when full-HD screens are all the rage, Lava has fitted the Iris Pro 20 with a display from 2011. Let's dive into the details. The phone features a Mediatek M6589 quad-core processor with 1GB of RAM and a PowerVR SGX544 takes care of the graphics. The Iris Pro 20 has an internal storage of 4GB of which only around 1GB is available to use. It is highly recommend that users add external storage using Micro-SD cards. It supports up to 32GB. An 8-megapixel camera with dual flash takes care of shutterbugs. It can shoot videos at 1080p resolution. The front-facing camera, which is something buyers are very particular about these days thanks to the selfie-craze, can only capture pictures in VGA resolution. Both the Micro-SIM cards operate at these quad-band frequencies: 850/900/1800/1900MHz and one of them can connect to the 3G band of 2100MHz. The phone also has Bluetooth 4.0 with A2DP support along with an accelerometer and a proximity sensor. What's missing is a gyroscope. Just like the Iris Pro 30, this phone features a One Glass Solution (OGS) display. The only difference is that it features a qHD (960x540) resolution screen. Now that wouldn't be too much of a problem if the screen was vibrant but it isn't. The screen is washed out and the legibility under sunlight takes a major hit. The screen, however, has decent colour reproduction. Software The Lava Iris Pro 20 runs vanilla Android 4.2.1 (Jelly Bean) and we have spoken at length about it in the past. There is no word on an update yet, though. The only additions are in the form of a Lava care app that plainly lists all Lava service centers that are available in India and CPU usage data to the notification slider. We believe that the latter is a really nifty addition and gives users a direct view of the RAM usage. The phone also carries forward a call handling feature from the Lava Iris Pro 30 which allows the phone to silence a call when it rings. It worked as advertised. The voice pattern feature and the face unlock feature are also present here. Unlike the stellar performance of the face unlock function on the Lava Iris Pro 30; here the recognition was not accurate most of the times. Camera It is a pity that Lava stuck to a camera app that transports us to the good old glory days of Android Gingerbread. Fortunately, it features an HDR mode and a face recognition mode. Some of the more advanced features are hidden. Without some snooping around, we wouldn't have realised that by default the video resolution was set to 'Medium' and not 'Fine'. The latter mode helps users shoot in 1080p. Once focussed, the camera takes pictures really fast and Lava also adds a zero-shutter (lag) mode for taking photographs faster. It works well. In daylight, the camera captures photographs with smudged details and chromatic aberration. Lowlight photography is not recommended on this phone is not recommended. A multi-angle mode goes beyond the panorama and adds a bit of angular depth to the captured image. It is fun to use but definitely not unique. In the video capture mode, interested users can warp the footage using software features that Lava offers but please not that it is buried inside settings. The quality of captured video is not decent at best and once again, suffers from loss of details. We believe it is better to have no front camera than a VGA one. Stay away. Performance The Mediatek M6589 processor under the hood is the same as the one seen in the Iris Pro 30 and surprisingly in the synthetic benchmarks; the Lava Iris Pro 20 performs slightly better. This is not to say that it is good compared to the rest of the phones in the same price range. In our quadrant test the Iris Pro 20, logged a score of 4,126 which is slightly higher than the elder siblings 3,936. In the Antutu benchmark we got a result of 13,202. The graphics tests were also below average with 3D Mark's Ice Storm scenario returning a score of 3,803 and Gfxbench ran at 6.1 frames per second. Phones fitted with the low-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 should perform better. Don't expect the phone to playback 1080p videos without throwing up artifacts during playback or skipping frames. It is almost unwatchable. Anything below that resolution and it handles fine. The phone's speaker is really loud. The same cannot be said about the voice calls, though, because they tend to mute the voice clarity on the receiver's end. The battery life of the Lava Iris Pro 20 is good but not better than the elder sibling and should easily last you an entire day. It lasted us for six hours and ten minutes before we had to put it for charge. Verdict We think Lava Iris Pro 20, priced at Rs. 12,799 phone is destined to live under the shadows of the elder sibling. The price difference between the two phones is Rs. 2,200 and for that money you get a much better screen, battery life and camera. Discounting the lower-specced camera, non-expandable memory and slightly boring design, we would easily recommend the Moto G over both the options. Rest assured: Satisfaction guaranteed.

More Mobiles »

Advertisement

© Copyright NDTV Convergence Limited 2014. All rights reserved.
Sign in

Advertisement

Advertisement